---

Forex multi-account manager Z-X-N
Accepts global forex account operation, investment, and trading
Assists family office investment and autonomous management

---



---

In the two-way trading of foreign exchange (forex), many Chinese citizens are cautious about becoming forex traders and rarely even mention it. There are multiple reasons for this phenomenon.

---

First, China's national policies impose certain restrictions and prohibitions on forex trading, leaving forex trading in a legally ambiguous state in mainland China. Currently, there are no clear laws and regulations in mainland China regulating whether investors can participate in forex trading. This legal gap has created a gray area for forex trading, discouraging many potential investors. However, forex is a very common financial investment product in other countries around the world, and its legality and ubiquity are widely recognized.
Furthermore, the global forex market in China is relatively chaotic, with frequent scams, making the forex investment sector a hotbed for fraud. This has severely tarnished the reputation of forex trading, leading many investors to mistakenly believe it is an unreliable financial market. This negative impression has further exacerbated Chinese citizens' fear and distrust of forex trading.
Furthermore, many investors lack a systematic understanding and technical skills of forex trading. They often suffer losses in the market, yet the very nature of the forex market is that some gain while others lose, conforming to the 80/20 rule. However, many Chinese mistakenly believe that forex trading is a guaranteed win, equating it to the stable returns of regular savings. This unrealistic expectation leads to disappointment and fear when faced with losses, further hindering their willingness to participate in forex trading.
Finally, the market is plagued by numerous junk and fraudulent forex brokerage platforms. These platforms offer no guarantee of fund security and often manipulate transactions behind the scenes, interfering with traders' legitimate trading practices. This opaque and unsafe market environment deters many investors from forex trading.
In summary, Chinese citizens' cautious attitude toward forex trading stems from a combination of factors. Policy uncertainty, market chaos, a lack of professional knowledge, and platform security issues all contribute to a significant trust crisis in forex trading in China. To change this situation, we need to address multiple aspects, including policy transparency, market regulation, investor education, and platform oversight, to gradually enhance the legality and security of foreign exchange trading in China, thereby enabling more investors to rationally participate in this global financial market.

In the two-way trading landscape of foreign exchange investment, "apprenticeship" is an option many traders consider when exploring profitable paths. However, it's important to objectively understand its core value. While apprenticeship may not directly lead to successful trading, it can help traders avoid common pitfalls in the industry, reduce trial and error costs, and avoid detours.

---

"Apprenticeship" here doesn't mean a traditional "master-disciple" relationship. Rather, it means learning from practitioners with long-term practical experience and established trading systems to acquire market-proven knowledge and methods. For example, this involves learning how to establish position management rules that align with one's risk appetite, how to adapt trading strategies to different market cycles, and how to cope with the psychological fluctuations of consecutive losses. If a trader were to explore this knowledge on their own, it would likely take years and considerable financial investment to develop it. However, through apprenticeship, one can grasp the core principles in a shorter timeframe, avoiding common pitfalls like heavy losses and ineffective strategies. However, it's important to understand that the value of apprenticeship lies solely in shortening the learning curve, not directly in improving profitability. Ultimate success depends on the trader's ability to absorb the knowledge, validate it through practical experience, and maintain discipline and correct errors in trading. There's no absolute guarantee that apprenticeship will guarantee profitability.
From the perspective of the inheritance logic of the global trading industry, the transmission of trading skills in international financial markets, represented by Wall Street, has long been characterized by "family inheritance" or "systematic apprenticeship." The formation of this model is closely tied to centuries of financial development history abroad. Since the birth of modern financial markets, trading knowledge and practical experience have been passed down through generations within families (e.g., if the father is a seasoned trader, the children are exposed to the market from an early age, influenced by their father's experience) or through institutional "mentor-apprenticeship" systems (e.g., within securities firms and fund companies, experienced traders guide newcomers through real-world trading, gradually imparting core skills). This has formed a stable inheritance chain. The core advantage of this inheritance model lies in the authenticity and practicality of experience. In family-based inheritance, elders will unreservedly share their long-accumulated risk control techniques, market analysis logic, and even plans for dealing with black swan events, without worrying about the cost of "paying for knowledge." In institutional mentorship, newcomers can learn directly in a real-world trading environment, gaining experience through trial and error with institutional funds, and avoiding personal financial losses. This model aligns with the logic of family inheritance in professions like doctors, lawyers, and teachers: these professions require "implicit experience" accumulated through long-term practice (such as a doctor's clinical judgment intuition and a lawyer's courtroom skills). Close family or mentor-apprentice contact allows these "implicit experiences" to be efficiently passed on, significantly reducing the financial cost of learning. "Saving tuition" becomes the most direct and important driving force behind this inheritance model, contributing to the continued emergence of practitioners with solid foundations in the international trading sector.
However, in the domestic foreign exchange trading sector, many traders have a fundamentally distorted understanding of "apprenticeship." Their core purpose in seeking a "master" isn't to acquire trading knowledge and skills, but rather to find a "god of wealth who can lead them directly to profit." They equate apprenticeship with a shortcut to profit. This understanding overlooks the core principles of trading: the underlying principles of forex trading are actually quite simple. For example, core principles like "light long-term positions reduce risk," "strict stop-loss orders control losses," and "profit relies on probabilistic advantages" don't require specialized guidance from a "master"; they can be mastered through basic industry books and compliant knowledge platforms. The true difficulty of trading lies not in "knowing the principles" but in "practicing them"—enduring the temptations of market fluctuations and not blindly chasing short-term fluctuations; maintaining discipline amidst the fluctuations of account profits and losses, not expanding positions out of greed or prematurely cutting losses out of fear. These skills cannot be directly acquired through "teaching from a master": the "heart" in trading (i.e., managing one's mindset) requires self-cultivation through countless real-world trading sessions, gradually learning to remain rational during profits and calm during losses; the "cognition" in trading (i.e., understanding market principles) requires continuous review and analysis of the alignment between one's own operations and the market, gradually developing a personalized judgment logic. Even with a master's guidance, if one does not personally undergo the closed cycle of "practice-reflection-correction," one will be unable to transform others' experience into one's own, ultimately falling into the dilemma of "understanding the principles but not being able to put them into practice."
In the domestic forex trading environment, while "self-study" is considered by some to be an inefficient and useless path, it is a realistic option that most traders must face. On the one hand, China lacks a mature trading succession system, and the number of experienced traders with practical experience and a willingness to share their knowledge is limited. Most institutions or individuals who offer "apprenticeship" services essentially profit from "training fees" and "taking a share of the profits" and fail to provide truly valuable guidance. On the other hand, the personalized nature of forex trading dictates that even with external guidance, self-study is ultimately required to adapt to individual needs. Traders with different capital sizes, risk appetites, and time and energy resources will ultimately need to adapt their strategies. (For example, long-term strategies are suitable for office workers, while swing trading strategies can be a good option for full-time traders.) These details require gradual adjustment through self-study. While self-study may present challenges such as long trading cycles and the risk of losses, it also offers hidden benefits. By reading classic industry texts, analyzing market reports from legitimate platforms, and reviewing their own trading records, traders not only accumulate foundational trading knowledge but also gradually develop market judgment. For example, they can identify false online claims such as "guaranteed profits" and "double your profits in a short period of time," and discern scams such as "high-leverage trading" and "fake platforms." Even if they fail to achieve profits in the short term, they can avoid further financial losses. This ability to identify risk is even more crucial for long-term forex trading than acquiring profitable techniques.
The core principle of forex trading is "practice makes perfect." Any theoretical knowledge or experience gained from others ultimately needs to be transformed into effective skills through real-world practice. The essence of practice is "trial and error with capital." Either you use your own funds to cover the costs of trial and error and learn from losses, or you gain the trust of others and practice with their funds (such as institutional trading accounts or funds from asset management products). For traders lacking initial capital, the opportunity to practice with others' funds is highly incidental and relies more on luck. For example, they might encounter an experienced trader who recognizes their learning ability and is willing to provide a small account for them to practice, or they might join a reputable trading institution and gradually gain exposure to real-world trading from an assistant position. However, be wary of the online trading myths about achieving financial freedom with a small amount of capital. Many of these myths lack real, verifiable evidence. Blindly imitating the trading methods (such as high leverage and heavy short-term positions) in these myths will only accelerate financial losses. For ordinary traders, a more rational approach is to "base yourself on your own reality and proceed steadily." If you have a small amount of personal capital, you can start with very small positions (e.g., risking no more than 1% of your principal) and gradually build experience. If you don't have funds yet, you can familiarize yourself with platform operations and verify strategy logic through simulated trading. Once you've formed a preliminary understanding, consider entering the market with a small amount of capital. There's no need to overly envy others' "successful paths" or question your own "self-study" choices. With a consistent approach to learning and rational practice, you can gradually grow in forex trading and find a profitable rhythm that suits you.

In two-way forex trading, traders need to be able to distinguish between different types of short-term trading, particularly those based on insider information and those based on pure short-term trading. This distinction is crucial, as the two differ significantly in nature and success rate.

---

For large-capital forex traders, short-term trading using insider information often yields success. This phenomenon is evident in numerous historical examples. For example, investors who crashed the British pound exploited the UK's strategic reluctance to join the Eurozone. The UK adopted a "cutting off one's arm to survive" strategy, deliberately devaluing the pound to widen the gap between its value and the euro, making Eurozone membership impossible. This type of manipulation based on insider information is essentially a strategic short-term trade, and its success is not accidental. Furthermore, foreign exchange banks exploiting the five-minute time difference before the end of the London trading day to manipulate a currency for profit is another classic example of insider manipulation and short-term trading. These tactics have an extremely high success rate because they rely on precise grasp and exploitation of inside market information.
However, for retail traders with smaller capital, the situation is quite different. Due to limited capital, they are often unable to engage in long-term investment and can only rely on the flexibility of their small capital to engage in short-term trading. However, retail traders need to understand that the success of short-term trading based on insider information and manipulation does not mean that pure short-term trading can easily lead to success. Currently, participation in short-term forex trading is dwindling, and the global forex investment market is generally quiet. This is due to the decline in the number of short-term traders and the lack of clear trends in the currency market. Major central banks worldwide are generally implementing low or even negative interest rate policies. The interest rates of major currencies are closely tied to those of the US dollar, resulting in relatively stable currency values ​​and minimal fluctuations. Consequently, short-term trading opportunities are decreasing. Currencies mostly fluctuate within a narrow range, making it difficult for short-term traders to find suitable opportunities.
Therefore, retail traders with small capital must recognize that pure short-term trading is difficult to profit from in the current market environment. Once they accept this understanding, they can better plan their forex investment strategies. They can either choose to invest lightly and for the long term, gradually accumulating returns through a steady strategy, or consider exiting the forex market and seeking other more suitable investment areas. This not only improves understanding of forex investment but also provides the ultimate solution for achieving steady investment.

In the two-way trading world of forex investment, the key indicator of a trader's maturity and ability to achieve sustained success lies not in short-term profits or market analysis accuracy, but rather in their mastery of "pending order trading techniques" and their ability to "strategize position timing."

---

Pending order trading, as a core operating method in forex trading that relies on pre-set conditions and is independent of real-time market conditions, directly reflects a trader's ability to comprehensively judge market trends, support and resistance levels, and risk-reward ratios. Position timing, on the other hand, demonstrates a trader's deep understanding of money management rules and their practical adaptability. Together, these two elements form the core bridge from "theoretical understanding" to "real-world profitability" and are the essential distinction between "ordinary traders" and "mature and successful traders." If a trader can only place orders based on intuition in real-time market conditions, but fails to automate and precisely execute strategies through pending orders, or lacks scientific logic in position adjustments, even if they can profit in the short term due to luck, they will inevitably suffer losses in the long term due to randomness in their operations, making it difficult for them to achieve mature and successful trading.
In the pending order system for forex trading, the two core pending orders for rising markets—Buy Stop (buy on a breakout) and Buy Limit (buy on a pullback)—directly test a trader's ability to judge trend continuity and the rhythm of pullbacks. The core logic of the Buy Stop pending order is to "follow the trend." It is suitable for scenarios where an upward trend has been established and is likely to continue after breaking through a key resistance level. Traders should place a buy order above the previous high (or key resistance level). When the market breaks through this point and the pending order is triggered, automatically enter the market to capitalize on profit opportunities arising from trend continuation. For example, if EUR/USD forms a previous high of 1.0920 during an uptrend, and a trader believes a breakout above this level will trigger a new upward trend, they can set a Buy Stop order at 1.0925 with a stop-loss at 1.0900. (A break below the previous high invalidates the trend confirmation.) This avoids the hesitation and delays associated with manually chasing the upward trend while also limiting risk through a pre-set stop-loss. Buy Limit orders, on the other hand, follow the principle of "buying the dip against the trend" and are suitable for scenarios where a healthy pullback occurs during an uptrend, with a high probability of a rebound after reaching a key support level. Traders should set a buy order below the previous low (or key support level). When the market pulls back to this level, the order is triggered, allowing them to enter the market at a lower cost. For example, in an uptrend in EUR/USD, if the market pulls back to 1.0850 (a previous pullback low and corresponding to support at the 20-day moving average), and a trader determines that this support level is valid, they can set a Buy Limit order at 1.0855 with a stop-loss at 1.0830 (if the support level falls below, the pullback will be unexpected), thereby achieving a "buy low" strategy. The key to these two types of orders lies in "precise point selection"—a comprehensive assessment of trend strength, the effectiveness of support and resistance levels, and trading volume fluctuations, rather than blindly placing orders at arbitrary highs and lows.
The two core orders for a downtrend—Sell Stop (sell on a breakout) and Sell Limit (sell on a pullback)—test a trader's ability to predict the continuation of the downtrend and the rhythm of the rebound. The core logic of a Sell Stop order is to "sell with the trend." It's suitable for scenarios where a downtrend has formed and is likely to continue after breaking through a key support level. Traders place a sell order below the previous low (or key support level). When the market breaks below that level, the order is triggered, allowing them to automatically enter the market to capitalize on the continued decline. For example, if GBP/USD forms a previous low of 1.2450 during a downtrend, and a trader predicts that the decline will accelerate after breaking below that level, they can place a Sell Stop order at 1.2445 with a stop-loss at 1.2470. (A rebound above the previous low will invalidate the downtrend.) This allows them to accurately follow the downtrend. A Sell Limit order, on the other hand, follows the "sell against the trend" logic. It's suitable for scenarios where a short-lived rebound occurs during a downtrend and a potential decline occurs after reaching a key resistance level. Traders place a sell order above the previous high (or key resistance level). When the market rebounds to that level, the order is triggered, allowing them to exit the market at a higher price. For example, if GBP/USD rebounds to 1.2520 (a previous rebound high and corresponding to resistance at the 50-day moving average) during a downtrend, a trader, judging this resistance as valid, places a sell limit order at 1.2515 with a stop-loss at 1.2535 (a breakout of resistance would indicate an unexpected rebound). This allows them to "sell high" through the pending order. Similar to pending orders in an uptrend, the key to these two types of pending orders lies in "confirming the trend direction" and "judging the effectiveness of support and resistance." Avoid blindly placing orders when the trend is unclear, as this can lead to market reversals and losses.
In the practice of forex trading, the skill level of pyramiding positions during pullbacks and the ability to balance position size with total capital are more indicative of a trader's maturity than the placement of pending orders. This can even be considered the "unspoken key to success" in trading. There are two types of pyramid position layout: "upright pyramid" and "inverted pyramid". Their application requires a comprehensive assessment of market trends, retracement range, and capital scale: the upright pyramid layout is suitable for scenarios where "trend is confirmed and retracement range is controllable". That is, the initial position is relatively light. If the market develops as expected and subsequently retraces to a better position, the position is gradually increased to form a "light bottom, heavy top" position structure. For example, in an uptrend, the first entry is made with a 1% position through a Buy Limit order. If the market rebounds and then pulls back to a lower support level, an additional order is placed with a 1.5% position. If the market continues to pull back and the support level is valid, a third order is placed with a 2% position. By "buying more as the price falls", the average holding cost is reduced while avoiding the high risk of an initial heavy position. The inverted pyramid layout is suitable for scenarios with a high degree of certainty in the early stages of a trend. This involves initially entering with a heavy position. If the market develops as expected, the amount of added position is gradually reduced during subsequent pullbacks, creating a "heavy bottom, light top" structure. For example, upon a breakout above a key resistance level triggering a buy stop order, an initial entry position of 3% is recommended. If the market continues to rise after a small pullback, an additional 2% is added. Upon further pullbacks, an additional 1% is added. This maximizes returns by "heavy initial position to capture certain gains, and light position later to control risk." The key to both of these layout patterns lies in the timing of incremental increases and decreases in position size. Ensure that the total position after each increase does not exceed the safe upper limit of the total capital (generally, a maximum of 10% of the principal in a single instrument is recommended). Each increase in position must be supported by clear logic (such as confirmation of support and resistance levels and verification of trend strength) to avoid blindly increasing positions and causing overall risk exposure to spiral out of control.
For established and successful forex traders, the ability to balance position size with total capital is crucial for long-term survival and profitability. For example, if a trader has $100,000 in capital and sets their risk exposure per trade to no more than 1.5% of their capital (meaning a maximum single loss of $1,500), when setting a Buy Limit order, they should inversely calculate their position size based on the stop-loss margin. If the spread between the pending order and the stop-loss is 50 pips (a standard lot fluctuates by $10 per pip), they can open a single position of 3 standard lots (50 pips x $10 per pip x 3 lots = $1,500). Subsequent increases to the position size should be kept within 10 standard lots (10 standard lots x $10 per pip fluctuation = $100 per pip). A market fluctuation of 150 pips would be required to reach the 1.5% risk cap, far exceeding typical volatility). This principle of "positioning based on risk," rather than "positioning based on profit expectations," is a key indicator of optimal timing. Many ordinary traders fail precisely because they ignore the relationship between position size and capital. During a drawdown, they blindly adopt the "inverted pyramid" approach. Initial positions reach 20% of their principal, and subsequent increases push their total positions to over 50%. If the market reverses, a single loss can exceed 10% of their principal. This cumulative effect inevitably leads to significant account shrinkage. However, experienced traders, through precise position timing, can maximize gains through pyramiding in trending markets and limit losses through position control when markets exceed expectations. Ultimately, they achieve "sustained profits with manageable risk." This is the key secret that distinguishes them from ordinary traders and the ultimate criterion for determining their maturity and success.

In two-way forex trading, forex brokers often derive their primary profit from stop-loss orders and margin calls for short-term, small-capital retail traders.

---

This phenomenon warrants serious reflection for forex traders, as frequent short-term trading and stop-loss orders are not only harmful to the trader themselves but can also lead them into a vicious cycle of continuous losses. Therefore, sober traders should seriously reflect on the dangers of short-term trading and frequent stop-loss orders and re-evaluate their trading strategies.
Forex brokers are generally unfavorable to large investors because they tend to have greater experience and more robust trading strategies. They rarely generate additional profits for the broker due to stop-loss orders or margin calls. Conversely, large investors are typically low-frequency traders, and their trading activity contributes relatively little to the broker's platform's profits, at least far less than that of frequent small-cap retail investors. Based on this reality, forex brokers worldwide generally impose deposit restrictions on large investors. While this practice is understandable, it also reflects the different attitudes brokers have towards different types of investors.
Given this, forex traders should reevaluate the necessity of short-term trading and frequent stop-loss orders. By thinking in reverse, small retail traders might consider abandoning short-term trading and turning to long-term investing. Long-term investing not only reduces trading frequency and mitigates the risks associated with frequent trading, but also allows for the accumulation of returns through more robust strategies. Furthermore, when shifting to long-term investing, small retail traders can adopt a light-weight, zero-position strategy as an alternative to traditional stop-loss strategies. This strategy not only effectively controls risk but also avoids capital losses caused by frequent stop-loss orders.
If large investors continue to maintain a low-frequency trading pattern, and small retail traders gradually abandon short-term trading and stop-loss strategies, global forex margin trading rules may need to be adjusted. Brokers may resort to increasing spreads or fees to maintain profitability. Otherwise, if traders generally shift to long-term investing, forex brokers' revenue could be significantly reduced, potentially even rendering the entire forex margin trading system unsustainable.
Therefore, when formulating a trading strategy, forex traders should not only consider their own risk tolerance and investment objectives, but also have a clear understanding of the operating mechanisms of the forex market and the broker's profit model. By adjusting their strategies appropriately, traders can protect their own interests while also contributing to the healthy development of the forex market.

---

---

• 
• 

---

13711580480@139.com

+86 137 1158 0480

+86 137 1158 0480

+86 137 1158 0480

z.x.n@139.com

Mr. Z-X-N

China · Guangzhou

---